What is the case for water companies to increase bills amid a track record of debt and dividends?

In the following few years, utility corporations wish to improve the price of our water payments.

The plan to hike the annual price of water for households was introduced on Monday.

It got here as a shock for a lot of – it was solely per week in the past that the trade regulator, Ofwat, discovered nearly all of corporations in England and Wales have been underperforming.

Ofwat even ordered corporations to give thousands and thousands of kilos again to prospects.

Now the identical regulator is being requested to approve a rise in family payments.

That’s regardless of the headlines about sewage overflows spoiling seashores and rivers, fuelling public disgust – which earlier this yr compelled corporations to apologise and pledge to wash up their act.

Even the federal government itself could have damaged environmental legal guidelines on the spillages, a watchdog not too long ago revealed.

With all of this occurring – and to not point out a price of dwelling disaster – how can a rise in payments be justified?

The case for greater payments and higher water companies

Industry physique Water UK, which represents the nation’s water corporations, mentioned the enterprise plans put ahead by its members are geared toward tackling issues that want fixing – together with shortages and sewage leaks.

It mentioned the plans – paid for by growing family payments – would create plenty of enhancements for purchasers and are crucial for the long run.

Money from the invoice hike would fund 10 new reservoirs, reduce leaks and cease the equal of 6,800 Olympic swimming swimming pools price of sewage spills, corporations insist.

Water UK mentioned the size of the work meant that the typical invoice in England would probably rise by £7 monthly by 2025, rising to £13 by 2030.

That could be equal to £156 extra per yr.

Water corporations mentioned they have been planning to greater than double the variety of households eligible for monetary help, rising to three.2 million from two million at the moment, to assist offset the larger payments.

And David Henderson, chief government of Water UK, insisted funding is “essential” for a altering local weather and a rising inhabitants – whereas stressing corporations have been working to repair leaks and spills.

Critics argue, nevertheless, that the water trade is not simply wasteful with spillages however with its cash, too.

They do not dispute that funding is required however have been scathing about the concept shoppers ought to pay for it.

Below, we check out a few of the stand-out statistics from earlier years which have led to widespread criticism of the businesses.

A monitor report of debt

David Hall, a visiting professor on the University of Greenwich, printed a report for the Public Services International Research Unit (PSIRU) final yr which included a breakdown of the water corporations’ debt figures.

Here’s a take a look at what the entire debt reported by every of the UK’s greatest water corporations was between 1991 and 2019, as highlighted within the report:

Thames Water: £11.7bn
United Utilities: £7.5bn
Anglian Water: £7.2bn
Severn Trent Water: £6.2bn
South West Water: £4.8bn
Yorkshire Water: £4.3bn
Northumbrian Water: £2.9bn
Wessex Water: £2.1bn
Southern Water: £2.1bn

Water corporations have argued that their debt exists to finance funding, a lot of which goes into upgrading water high quality and chopping down on leakage.

Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant


Water UK urges finish to new reservoir opposition

Billions paid to shareholders

The identical report regarded on the quantities of cash paid out to shareholders by the water trade.

Since privatisation, it has been a median of £2bn yearly.

That’s added as much as at the least £66bn to shareholders in dividends since 1989 – over £10bn greater than the entire quantity of debt the trade is in.

Prof Hall’s report included a breakdown of all dividends paid by England’s water and sewerage corporations between 2010 and 2021 – a complete of roughly £18.9bn.

Here’s a take a look at how the report says every water firm contributed to that quantity:

Anglian Water: £5.1bn
United Utilities: £3.1bn
Severn Trent Water: £2.3bn
Thames Water: £1.9bn
South West: £1.5bn
Yorkshire Water: £1.4bn
Northumbrian Water: £1.4bn
Wessex Water: £1.2bn
Southern Water: £902m

The corporations themselves level out the trade paid a median return of three.8% on shareholders’ funding in 2021 – half the typical for utilities and fewer than the regulator had allowed, whereas three corporations made a loss.

Water corporations additionally argue that with out funding from shareholders, enhancements to the water trade wouldn’t be funded, or must be financed by the Treasury.

Does cash from payments find yourself going to shareholders?

The most modern figures from the Competition & Markets Authority counsel 20% of water payments annually is used to pay dividends and curiosity.

The PSIRU breaks this down additional, saying dividends price every family a median of £69 per yr between 2010 and 2021.

Water corporations say the size of proposed enhancements to the trade is just too huge for governments or billpayers to satisfy alone, which is why it is necessary to maintain the trade enticing to buyers.

They additionally say the water system is funded by buyers making a downpayment on the infrastructure, which is then recouped by way of payments over many a long time, with “a small return”.

Big bonuses for water firm bosses regardless of spills

Even in the event you settle for the trade’s arguments on the necessity for buyers and the explanations for debt, campaigners spotlight how senior figures at water corporations are nonetheless pocketing large payouts, whereas anticipating the general public to pay extra.

Political events are getting more and more concerned.

Water firm executives have been paid round £40m in bonuses, advantages and incentives over the previous three years, in keeping with an evaluation by the Liberal Democrats of 10 corporations in England and Wales.

Here’s what the Lib Dems say have been the entire bonuses paid to bosses annually by the foremost English water corporations, together with Dwr Cymru Welsh Water, which provides some bordering areas of England.

2020/21: £16.3m
2021/22: £15.1m
2022/23: £9.7m

The Lib Dems, together with different vocal trade critics, have closely criticised corporations for being beneficiant with government bonuses regardless of a excessive variety of sewage spills throughout the nation.

But the businesses say the bonuses have been paid to executives primarily based on their performances – and say that the variety of sewage spillages decreased annually between 2020 and 2023.

Government figures present that there have been 301,091 spills all through 2022, which was down from 372,533 in 2021 – however the Environment Agency largely put the advance right down to a lower in rainfall.

The water corporations have additionally apparently assured prospects that none of their cash was used to pay the bonuses in 2022/23.

The newest determine is decrease as a result of half of the 26 executives took no bonus.

What does the water trade say?

Water UK says the quantity of funding by corporations to date stands at £200bn over the previous three a long time.

“This investment has transformed the quality of our drinking water; cut pollution from sewage works by up to three quarters; and a sevenfold increase in the number of beaches achieving ‘excellent’ ratings since the 1990s,” it mentioned.

On the potential water invoice hike from 2025, a Water UK spokesperson mentioned: “These record-breaking investment proposals represent a completely new ambition, going well beyond any previous plans to secure our water supply as we deal with a changing climate and a growing population.

“While growing payments isn’t welcome, this funding in our nation’s infrastructure is crucial and nothing can be funded by way of payments that has already been paid for.

“Water companies are seeking regulatory approval to reduce overflow spills into rivers and seas as fast as possible and to more than double the number of households receiving support to pay their bills, with two million more households set to receive help.”